The Wayward Ward

The trials and misadventures of a competant 68 year old ward trying to facilitate termination of his guardianship.

My Photo
Name:
Location: Fairhaven, Massachusetts, United States

A man of diversified interests, and probably master of none. However at age 68, I find that learning is even more exiting than when I was a younger man. Because I function well mentally and physically, I am very motivated to Terminate my guardianship. Also I will endevour to communicate anything that I learn on how to approach this seemingly insurmountable problem.

Saturday, June 17, 2006

Next provocative and heart warming article:

DISABILITY, DEMENTIA and DEATH
In NURSING HOMES

***

Links I Love !!
by the Wayward Ward
6/17/06

DEEP AND RATIONAL FEMALE VIEWS (she’s really great): http://accordingtothemichael.blogspot.com

COMPUTER EXPERT (Consultant) WEB SITE: Good info:
http://weblogs.asp.net/bsimser/

RATE YOUR LIFE! – http://preethika.blogspot.com/

NURSING HOME ABUSE – http://www.lawyers.com/lawyers/A~1001884~LDC/Nursing+Home+Abuse+FAQ.html

COMPETENCE?, CAPACITY? OR INSTITUTION? – http://diabeticdick1.blogspot.com/2006/06/incompetance-incapacity-or-institution.html

Diabetic Dick – The Wayward Ward – http://diabeticdick1.blogspot.com/


HEALTH ISSUES OF A 68 YEAR OLD:
Patients Progress – http://patientsprogress.blogspot.com/

4. NURSING HOME ABUSE REPORT – http://www.nursinghomeabusereport.com/?p=171
reccomended by diabetic dick: 6/17/06

Sunday, June 11, 2006

NEW TUNIEWICZ BLOGS - URL'S

Hi Folks,
 
                I'm sending you folks copies of the new blog URL's
That I've been writing here in the nursing home.
It seems that when you get older you realize that there is a lot on your mind.
"Too soon we get old, Too late we get smart"
 
 
 
Tuniewicz **** Times, Tales & Terrors -
 
email me with your own stories, or just comment briefly on mine if you feel so inclined.
 
I have a list of about 50 Tuniewicz's hope some of you reply.
 
Sincerely,
 
Dick Tuniewicz        dicktun@hotmail.com

Tuesday, June 06, 2006


A picture of my Therapy dog, Blackie, who I'VE BEEN WITHOUT FOR THE PAST THREE YEARS. This 5 year old Schipperke was 19 pounds of courage and curiosity.

Links to other Blogs:
The Ageless Project: http://jenett.org/ageless/



Sunday, June 04, 2006

The Wayward Ward





Pictures of a very competant and self sufficient senior.





Labels: ,

INCOMPETANCE?, INCAPACITY? or INSTITUTION?- INTERNET BLOG

INCOMPETENCE?, INCAPACITY? and INSTITUTIONS

The saga of the deprivation of an innocent man’s liberty

By Richard Tuniewicz

 

"Enslave the liberty of but one human being and the liberties of the world are put in peril."
-
William Lloyd Garrison

 

INCOMPETENCE?

Unjustified adult guardianship, while not a common practice, is about as frequent as the execution of convicts who are too late found to be innocent. The fact that such things can happen in a free country, is evidence that our judicial system needs more oversight to protect the innocent. A group which has major vulnerability is the elderly.

A longtime resident of Nashua, NH, Richard Tuniewicz, age 68, and a diabetic, is in this vulnerable category. In the early summer of 2003, Richard called his doctor to make an appointment to get an infected heel ulcer treated. The doctor quickly admitted her patient to the Parkland Medical Center in Derry, NH, where she practiced as a vascular and general surgeon.

Within a day or two of admittance, Richard was telling his caregivers and son, Mark, of unusual dreams and possible hallucinations which he was experiencing. A nurse later told him that these experiences were a result of incompatibility between an antibiotic and other unspecified medications. A nurse was stationed in Richard’s room for a two week period until the strange phenomena subsided.

During this two week period, Richard’s son, decided that Richard would not be able to care for himself if he returned to his previous lifestyle. He proceeded to apply for permanent guardianship orders, despite his father’s disbelief and disapproval. Being naive, and ignorant of how little actual proof was needed to deprive him of his liberties, Richard never believed that his guardianship could become a reality. "I’ve always been a take charge guy", he explained.

For reasons which are still unclear, Mark Tuniewicz, asked the court for an expedited guardianship hearing, and stated that his father was incompetent, incapacitated, and indigent.

The hapless patient was prevented from attending the probate court hearing, even though he had mobility to use the bathroom and a wheelchair. The court appointed a lawyer, who met with Richard for one 10-15 minute visit. Needless to say, the efforts of the counsel were ineffective without Richard being present to refute and question lies and exaggerations.

The permanent guardianship orders, were approved by a gullible but well meaning judge whose mother was also a diabetic. Before the effective date of the court orders, Mark Tuniewicz had unilaterally canceled the lease on Richard’s subsidized NHA kitchenette, gave away his father’s small therapy dog, junked Richard’s operating Ford van, brought most of his father’s furniture, clothing and possessions to the city dump, and sold many other valuable items for a fraction of their worth. Gone and unaccounted for were, many expensive machinist’s tools, several gold rings, several watches, a camera collection, and three computers. A 32 inch Zenith television, VCR machine, and a Bose radio/CD player were among the purloined items.

Mark repeatedly states that he is only interested in his father’s welfare, and that he loves his dad. He says that he looks forward to Richard’s independent living. Richard asks, why did his son hire a high priced lawyer to prevent his father’s attempt to terminate the guardianship? Why did his son dispose of his dad’s apartment and all his possessions, effectively preventing a return to individual living? Richard is angry that his intelligent, financially secure, son and daughter, constantly discount the desires and needs of their father, and still claim to love him. "My kids express no guilt for subjecting me to this intense and stressful institutional environment" (nursing home). Richard states, "Their actions speak louder than words".

 

 

"The average ward in this country, under guardianship orders, has fewer rights than a felon"

Guardianship Gulag

INCAPACITY?

The lifestyle to which Mark was afraid his father would return, was a modest one to say the least. But Richard was content with his lot, for he had many of the things that he’d always had and needed. Fifteen years before the guardianship orders, Richard had raised and trained dogs. In 1986, he sold his home of 18 years, started and operated a machine shop. In 1990, he filed for bankruptcy, was considered homeless, lived with two dogs in his van, and attended college full time. All this was happening while he was treated for diabetes, and was a client of the State Dept. of Vocational Rehabilitation.

In 1992, Richard qualified for SSDI, which resulted in his being accepted as a NHA resident on Vagge Drive. In 1994, Richard had chest discomfort which resulted in his stay at a VA hospital for by pass heart surgery. He went straight home from the hospital, and completed his rehabilitation in the company of his beloved Bouvier des Flandres dog, and an occasional visiting nurse.

Being a diabetic since 1978, Richard looked for and arranged for primary care treatment by a new endocrinologist, Dr. Flynn. A toe infection in 1996 resulted in a one toe amputation, a short stay in a rehabilitation center, and a return home with a computer operated IV antibiotic dispenser. While under doctors orders to limit walking, the senior still made daily trips in his van for shopping, postal pickups, and appointments. Meals were cooked, and a few extra dollars were brought in by selling old items on the E-bay computer auction site. All during this time Richard combated a tendency toward depression by becoming a client at the Community Council in Nashua. This organization provided assistance by sending counselors to visit on a weekly basis. Some of the counselors would assist in shopping or help with housekeeping.

Since the heart surgery, and through to 2003, Mr. Tuniewicz was prescribed a dozen different pills, primarily cardiology meds, and vitamins, but also injectable insulin, for the Type 2 diabetes. He first arranged to have the meds mailed to him by the VA. Later on he found that he qualified for the State of NH Medicaid insurance, so was able to pick up his meds monthly at the nearby drug store. He organized the pills into a two week calendar system, which he refilled twice a month. His glucose checks were made with the latest technology meter (One Touch), which would display a three day graph of his blood sugar tests and store many readings which could be downloaded to his computer, and printed out for the use of his diabetes educator or endocrinologist.

2003 was a year of significant change, Mr. Tuniewicz’s endocrinologist moved out of town, he developed an ulcer on his heel which became infected, the Community Council transferred his case to their elder care section, and his consulting psychiatrist was replaced by a very disagreeable nurse practitioner. The CC counselors in the new section were very much unlike his previous counselors. His experiences with them was discouraging. They seemed to be less motivated toward counseling, motivation and assistance. One young lady even told her supervisor that Mr. Tuniewicz made a lewd suggestion, when he had only commented that it was "a beautiful day for a picnic, with a blanket on the grass, a loaf of fresh bread, some cheese and a bottle of wine."

Visiting nurses were becoming unbelievably demanding, obviously having less respect for the opinions of an elderly person. A certain nurse, while attempting to pet my therapy dog, was nipped by the 19 pound pet. No blood or skin breakage was noticeable, but she reported it to her superiors. For this I was characterized as having a vicious dog. Once I reported a supervisory nurse for being, rude, hostile, and disrespectful. This resulted in her calling a meeting of the visiting nurse staff, and having me blackballed by their organization. Fortunately, a nursing service in an adjacent town was contracted to fill the gap.

"Absolute liberty is absence of restraint; responsibility is restraint; therefore, the ideally free individual is responsible to himself."
-
Henry Brooks Adams

INSTITUTIONS

Mr. Tuniewicz’s guardianship became effective in the early fall of 2003. Right around that time, his son and daughter (joint guardians) decided that he should be confined to a nursing home, even though the infected ulcer was nearly healed, and his mobility was not in question. An out of state nursing home was selected, for reasons not specified. Lowell Health Care and Rehabilitation was the name of the nursing home which specialized in the care and long term storage of coma patients, and patients with Huntington’s disease. During this period, he often accompanied his guardians to family events, dinner outings, even bowling and pool playing excursions. Richard made regular medical visits to his doctor in Derry, NH. Within a short period, the ulcer was healed and the doctor wrote a note saying that Richard could live independently.

There were numerous problems at Lowell Health Care. During the first few weeks there, Richard noticed unusual and unique dreams. He wasn’t frightened by them, but was perplexed by the vividness of the experiences. He had one hallucination during this period, that of needles coming out of his head and then disappearing into thin air. After discussing it with the staff, and being prescribed the appropriate anti-hallucinogen, the imaginary needles were soon only a memory. Along with the needles, the unusual dreams also vanished.

Patients at this institution had the run of the facility. They were not well supervised, and some regularly went into other patients’ rooms and stole whatever was not tied down. I had one big tall black man who repeatedly came into my room and rummaged through lockers and drawers. The first couple of times that I observed him doing it, I reported it to the staff. They merely reprimanded him, but the lack of supervision did not change. It was obvious that just as on the outside, you primarily are responsible for your own security. After the deed is done, is too late to prevent it. I made it my business to keep an eye out for certain people who had a reputation for going into other peoples belongings. If the facility staff couldn’t protect me and my property, I’d have to take care of it myself, and so I did.

The well organized Lowell institution, had a behavior enforcement staff composed mostly of male Kenyan immigrants. I used to refer to them as the "Kenyan Mafia." On two occasions I had their attention, when they would come at me four at a time, for a minor infraction like my trying to take an unauthorized (non-diabetic) container of ice cream. They would grab at and twist my hands and arms, and on one occasion wrenched my shoulder causing permanent rotor cuff damage. My son Mark when told of this abuse, took no action as a guardian should, he ignored the situation and encouraged the staff to do as they thought best. Protection of his father and ward did not seem to be in the cards. I was moved from one floor to the next, three different times for behavioral problems. I found the address of the Lowell Housing Authority, and sent it to my daughter Sandy, who was my only effective guardian. My son Mark, had accepted a job in San Diego, CA, about three months after the guardianship became effective (Jan. 2004). Sandy contacted the Lowell Housing Authority, and they gave her information on how to apply for a subsidized apartment for her elderly father, in case the nursing home evicted him.

After sixteen months of stress, misery and violence in the Lowell nursing home, my daughter arranged for a third floor single bedroom apartment. This apartment was a long walk from the building’s entrance. Transportation was a problem because I was not provided a car which I needed to replace my van which was disposed of so irresponsibly. She furnished the apartment without any discussion with me about what I wanted or needed. The last of my cash fund were spent on a living room set, a bedroom set with a brand new mattress and box spring (aprox. $900.00) Also included in my furnishings was my lost but not forgotten previously new, 32 inch Zenith television set, which was used by someone for the last eighteen months, but still worked fine. Also provided was a desktop computer with cable internet service. None of the software which I had for my other three computers was included, nor was any of my old hard drive data saved or available. I was really sorry about the loss of my job history files. I had kept records of my 40+ varied jobs, and all my duties and accomplishments in each one. Also included were copies of various resumes constructed for specific jobs, and showing my wealth of diversified experience. A major source of pride in my life had been sent to the dump. There were hardly any clothes, but most of all, I grieved that my Schipperke therapy dog Blackie, was not there. Without the dog it was a lonely, morose environment. All I wanted to do was eat and sleep.

Every day of the week, a homemaker would come in to assist me with things that I could do for myself. Three days a week a LPN visiting nurse would come in for diabetic foot care and inspection. Physical and occupational therapy techs came in and we worked on some of the damage which resulted from my nursing home adventures. Things like cooking, cleaning, washing, shaving, were all things I was capable of doing, but my guardian daughter decided that I was not only disabled, but I was an invalid as well. The one good thing was that the homemaker would do the shopping each week from a list that I would provide. The bad thing was that my daughter had to come all the way down from Seabrook, NH each week, to bring me money with which to buy groceries. I was limited on what I could purchase because my daughter was still getting my social security check, and only doling out to me a bare minimum, and no extra. It was still better than being institutionalized.

My daughter arranged for my health care needs to be met by a haughty, know it all nurse practitioner named Mac, at the VA clinic in Lowell. Mac and I did not see eye to eye, she did not like her pronouncements to be questioned, so I was the ultimate thorn in her side. When I developed a blister on my right heel, she sent me by bus to a podiatrist, who prescribed an ointment designed to remove dead skin. This prescription was kept on the wound faithfully three days a week, by the visiting LPN, for three months, until finally the whole bottom of the heel was raw. The heel was again infected so I requested that I have an appointment with my surgeon, up in Derry, NH. In the meantime my daughter was communicating with the know it all nurse, and being advised that the deteriorating wound was my fault, and evidence that I couldn’t take care of myself. I honestly believe that my daughter wanted to believe that I couldn’t continue to live independently, because I was taking more of her time and trouble than I ever did living in a nursing home.

No sooner did I arrive in Derry to see the doctor, that I was admitted by her for the second time to Parkland Medical Center. The dumfounded doctor couldn’t understand how the wound could have gotten even worse than the first time I had come to her with it nearly eighteen months earlier. At that time she was told by my son that the reason for my infected wound was because of alleged unsanitary (supposedly filthy) conditions. This time, with a homemaker coming in to assist with the cleaning, there were no accusations of my keeping a dirty house. Nor were there any apologies by my guardians for not providing with quality health care, as I was used to arranging for myself. In addition, the Derry doctor had inspected my feet roughly six months previously, and under her care everything healed and I was given a clean bill of health. The wound was treated by vacuum therapy for about a month before I was notified that my chance at independent living was lost, and that my daughter had made the decision to close down my household, cancel the lease, dispose of my belongings (again), and place me in another nursing facility for an indeterminate period. When I tried to get to the source of her reasoning, all she would say is "I don’t think you would be safe". She would not discuss the source of her opinion, or listen to my views or pleas. I was filled with extreme emotions to say the least.

I was angry, disappointed, hurt, abandoned, raped, abused, and was aware of what it felt like to be without freedom or liberty. I then realized that the law and justice were not the same. I knew that whatever happened from now on that did not kill me, would make me stronger and tougher. I would fight whatever rules and systems that I didn’t agree with. I had nothing to lose.

 

Excerpts from Guardianship Gulag blog

Excerpts from the blog: Guardianship Gulag (very informative, check out this blog)

 

Whatever happened to the lawyers who "zealously" advocate the wishes of their clients.

Most attorneys seem to equate "guardianship" cases with leprosy_ untouchable. If you have $20,000 or more remaining, an attorney may take your case; that has nothing to do with the outcome. Contingency does not exist for guardianship. Public interest law groups will not ‘touch’ it.

"Bar" Attorneys, as they call themselves, are lazy creatures, who want to handle "boiler plate" approaches, a sort of a prefab, that makes them appear as if they know what they are doing, and then they do not have to do anything except collect the money. There is something more than wrong where they get paid if they fail, and such, the more they fail, the more they make!

There are different schemes for the rich and the poor. It involves the profound loss of freedom, and your very dignity, then ultimately your life.

According to commonly accepted standards, Guardians are supposed to "carry out the wishes, preferences, and values of the ward," but in reality, it is much different and certainly not what was intended by the individuals.

 

 

So called "licensed" clinical "social workers," are trained to tell you just what you want to hear, and then do the exact opposite, even their smile it is tainted and only there to deceive.

 

Misrepresentation is supposed to be prohibited! You walk into a "one way street" courtroom, and converse with a "judge" only to be immediately declared "incompetent," which is a pure and utter "death sentence." It is really hard to sue when you are dead! They know that. It is difficult to document the patterns of neglect, the mistakes in medication and other deficiencies like over-medication and mis-prescribing of the doctors and so forth, because virtually all the victims die within months. Consequently, no one knows exactly how widespread the problem really is

In "family court," "un-substanciated accusations" pass as "claims," which are submitted by trained professional attorneys based solely on "inadmissible evidence," and of course, without any witnesses and certainly always without the requirement of Law of two "diagnoses" from doctors.

The Law is an impenetrable thicket, where the courts are a "bottomless pit" where not only the "quality of life" is lost forever, but life itself is taken in a skillfully woven "case."

The Guardianships are delivering "care" with no certification, what-so-ever. In this unregulated environment, the potential for real abuse is so ever-present. Monitoring of the Administration of Guardian's guardianships remains nil to none. They appoint their own financial agent... there own social workers... there own controlled psychiatrists and on and on. The Guardians record as to rehabilitation at absolute zero, everyone is killed "on time," no on survives. There is no doubt that the very system that is supposed to be protecting them really ends up abusing them

 

They drug the victims rather than treatment for the illness as Negligence Extraordinare? The underlying ailments are not treated and psychotropic drugs are exchanged for the needed medicine. The "Nursing Home Inspection System" is corrupted. It is becoming more and more apparent that the survey and certification process, is also seriously corrupted. State inspectors understate the existence of serious "quality-of-care problems" like substandard care and questionable business practice(s).

Surveyors state that complaints are rarely interviewed thoroughly and the survey process itself, upon which we rely for accurate, objective and independent data, has been corrupted and we need to restore the integrity of the system if possible. The "assisted living facilities" are also "seriously corrupted," with state inspectors pressured to overlook or downplay problems.

Inspectors are "routinely instructed" to downgrade or ignore violations and told to rewrite their reports so the facilities' coming out looking better than they really are.

The system is broken.

Guardians are not, no ordinary thief, they think, your television -looks better in their living room; these guys -take everything... the house... the cars... the valuables... the bank account... your bank numbers... the jewelry... even the phones off the wall... everything, right down to your very address, permanent phone number and ID... not a scrap is left.

Judges are too often biased and self-serving. It places the "best interest" decision squarely in the hands of a judge without first according the wards own best interests? Need medical treatment(s)... 'go to court," need therapy... "go to court," where a merciless judge alone has the right to decide and there are "no emergencies in the law"... you die waiting!

Why is there no neighborhood outcry? You can hear the cries, over and over always the same: "How can they do this to me under the guise of Public Administration?" Then of course: "This is America,... these things do not happen in America!" Naturally they are perplexed and even angry, with the sudden loss of ones independence and the ensuing endless struggle to "win" it back.

The Wayward Ward    6/04/06

Thursday, June 01, 2006

DiabeticDick-Unfair Guardianship



Three years ago, I developed a heel ulcer the size of a small blister on the bottom of my right heel. The blister was getting attention from visiting nurses several times a week, but infection set in and I decided to go to a doctor (vascular surgeon) to get it cleared up. The doctor quickly signed me into Parkland Medical Center in Derry, NH.

Unfortunately, during my first few days there, I was given an antibiotic which the nurses said was not compatible with medications which I had been taking routinely. They didn't specify the names of the incompatible drugs, but I suspect that Celexa might have been incompatible with whatever antibiotic they decided to use.

The result was I found myself having some pretty vivid hallucinations(dreams?) which if they weren't so strange, I could have almost believed they were real. my response to the hallucinations varied from depression and lethargy, to a desire to take over the hospital to get my situation under better control. The hospital staff assigned a full time nurse to stay with me for about 2 weeks, until the symptoms (hallucinations), subsided.

During this two week period, my son applied to the county probate court for an expedited, hearing, for a permanent guardianship. It seems that he had read a book on guardianship, and found that it was an easy thing to accomplish if you had read the book.

Prior to my going in the hospital, I had been having some differences with a new counselor who was a nurse practitioner, and she was assigned to replace my previous counselor who was a certified psychiatrist. As a result of our differences, she asked to have a meeting with my children. I was reluctant , but I thought that maybe the kids would give me some moral support in dealing with this disagreeable person. Well, only my son showed up for the meeting, and to my surprise and disbelief, this nurse suggested that I be placed under guardianship orders. I thought she was crazy, or at least unrealistic. How could anyone think that a take charge guy like myself, could ever be considered in need of the protections of guardianship. For the previous eleven years I had lived with my dogs at the same location, paid all my bills, and had money left over from my social security check.

I had always arranged to have the prescribed medications and the insulin which I needed, and took them faithfully. For the past half dozen years, I had been seeing an endocrinologist who was also my primary care doctor. I had been through by-pass surgery, and had never needed a nursing home for recovery or rehab. A couple of years after the by-pass, I wound up with an infected large toe which had to be amputated. During the recovery, they sent me home with a computer operated IV machine for the around the clock antibiotic which was prescried. No one ever suggested that I be in a nursing home, for I was capable of replacing the antibiotic when it ran out, and I could take care of my meals and household chores s well.

I had a small male Schipperke dog who I loved, trained and cared for. The psychiatrist felt that having a dog was neccessary for the prevention of depression, because in my case I had owned a dog for my whole life. So my dog Blackie wa reffered to as my "therapy dog".

The court assigned a lawyer to my case because my son filled out papers which certified that I was "indigent". In this case it meant that I didn't have enough money in the bank to pay for a lawyer. So the court lawyer came to the hospital to talk to me for ten or fifteen minutes. I still expected the guardianship application to be thrown out of court, whether I was there or not. The proposal was so ridiculous.

I was incredulous at the result of the guardianship hearing (which I was not allowed to attend). My son had somehow convinced my doctor that I would be better off not attending the hearing, or having the hearing at my bedside. The guardianship orders went through without a hitch, and I shocked by the surealism of the situation, I was hoping that it was just another ridiculous hallucination.

To add insult to injury, my son gave away my therapy dog, who I had been keeping in a vet's kennel. Before the guardianship was even effective, he canceled the lease on my subsidised apartment for which I had waited , for about three years. He took nearly all my possesions, furniture and clothes to the dump. He kept my expensive camera and lens collection, and without consulting me sold the whole lot for the price that I had paid for my most recent camera purchase. He gave away my Ford window van, which I had repaired using all heavy duty parts, because I knew I wouldn't be likely to afford a new van. All my books, tapes, CD's, and my three computers were given away or otherwise disposed of. My accumulation of possessions of the previous thirty plus years, were irresponsibly disposed of as if I were dead and buried. I am really indigent now, through no fault of my own, I don't even have a dollar to buy a snack at the nursing home.

If there are any readers who are not bloggers but would like to relate similiar, or related experiences, please mail your responses to DiabeticDick; 184 Main Street, Rm. 113A; Fairhaven, MA 02719.